禅宗对邵雍重新定义太极思想的影响

Preface

Abbreviations

Chapter One： Introduction： The Existing Scholarship and Disser-tation Prospectus

1.1. The Existing Scholarship

1.2. A Summary of Existing Scholarship

1.3. My Research Subject

1.4. My Reasons for Selecting This Topic

1.5. The Significance and Value of this Research

1.6. Research Method： Hermeneutics

1.7. Dissertation Outline

1.8. The Sources ：

Conclusion

Chapter Two： Historical and Philosophical Background

2.1. The Political， Economic and Social Background

2.2. Cultural Background

2.2.1. The Reinvented Song Chan Buddhist School

2.2.2. Chan Buddhism in Literati Culture

2.2.2.1. The Tea Ceremony （chadao）

2.2.2.2. Chan Poetry

2.2.2.3. Chan Painting

2.2.2.4. The Art of Calligraphy （shufa yishu）

2.2.2.5. Literati' s Relationship with Chan Buddhism

2.2.3. The Rise of Neo-Confucianism and the Song Book of Chan（Songyi）

Conclusion

Chapter Three： Buddhism's Influence on the Life of Shao Yong

3.1. The Life of Shao Yong

3.2. Buddhist Influence on Shao Yong '，s Family

3.3. Shao Yong' s Study of Buddhism and his Practice of Chan

3.4. The Existing Scholarship on the non Buddhist Influence on Shao Yong' s Life

Conclusion

Chapter Four： Shao Yong's Redefinition of the Supreme Ultimate： The Mind as the Supreme Ultimate

4.1. Beginnings and Historical Developments： An Overview of the Supreme Ultimate

4.2. Shao Yong' s Redefinition of the Supreme Ultimate： The Mind as the Supreme Ultimate

4.2.1. The Innate Theory （Xiantian yixue）

4.2.1.1. Diagrams of the Sequence of the Eight Trigrams and Sixty-four Hexagrams

4.2.1.2. The Manifestation of the All Things

4.2.2. The Eight Trigrams and Sixty-four Hexagrams Directional Position Diagrams （bagua he liushisi gua fangweitu）

4.2.3. The Mind as the Supreme Ultimate

4.2.3.1. The Concept of One， Spirit and Images

4.2.3.2. The Concept of Numerals and Principle

4.2.3.3. The Concept of Principle and Mind

4.2.3.4. “One Mind” and the Supreme Ultimate

4.2.3.5. The Concept of “the Innate Theory is the Theory of Mind”

4.3. The Acquired Theory

Conclusion

Chapter Five： A Survey of Existing Research on the Subject

5.1. Was Shao Yong influenced by Mencius' Concept of“All Things are Complete within” * Me“？

5.2. Was Shao Yong influenced by Confucius' Concept of “Intrinsic Nature of Mind”

5.3. Was Shao Yong influenced by the Confucian Concept of “Investigation of Things （gewu） and Extension of Knowledge （zhizhi）”

5.4. Was Shao Yong Influenced by Philosophical and Religious Daoism？

Conclusion

Chapter Six： The Concept of “Realizing the Mind and Seeing Self-Nature” and Its Influence on Shao Yong's Redefinition of the Supreme Ultimate

6.1. Huineng' s Concept of “Realizing the Mind and Seeing Self-Nature”

6.1.1. An Analysis of Sources

6.1.2. “Buddha-Nature” and “praj”

6.1.3. Self-nature

6.1.4. Realizing the Mind and Seeing Self-Nature （shixin jianxing）

6.1.5. “Sudden-Enlightenment” Path of “No-Thought”

6.2. The Influence of Huineng upon Shao Yong' s Redefinition of the Supreme Ultimate

6.2.1. Buddha-Nature as Self-nature in Mind and Mind as the Supreme Ultimate

6.2.2. Self-Cultivation Pointing Directly at the Mind

6.2.3. Orientation towards Humanism

6.2.4. Merging of Worldly Dharma and Transmundane Dharma

Conclusion

Chapter Seven： Diagrams and Pictorial Schemes for the Concept of “Realizing the Mind and Seeing Self-Nature” and its Influence on Shao Yong

7.1. Zongmi' s Chan Diagrams and Pictorial Schemes

7.1.1. Zongmi and His Works

7.1.2. Chan Hermeneutical Diagram Indicating the Mind of Sentient Beings

7.1.3. The Relationship among Mind， the Supreme Ultimate and Alayavijnana

7.2. Linji Chan's Concept of “Four Discemments of Person and Object” （siliaojian）

7.3. The Caodong Chan Concept of Jeweled Mirror Samadhi（baojing san mei宝镜三昧）

7.3.1. Caoshan Benji， Dongshan Liangjia and Huihong Kuanfan

7.3.2. Jeweled Mirror Samadhi （baojing sanmei）

7.3.3. The Influence of Jeweled Mirror Samadhi on Shao Yong' s Redefinition of the Supreme Ultimate

7.3.4. Venerable Taixu' s （1890-1947） Scholarship

Conclusion

Chapter Eight： Chart Buddhism's Influence upon the Lineage of the Supreme Ultimate

8.1. The Issue of Whether the Lineage of the Supreme Ultimate Began with chen Tuan （906-1032）

8.2. The Issue of Whether the Supreme Ultimate Lineage can be Traced Back to Mayi Daozhe

8.2.1. The Existing Scholarship on the Subject

8.2.2. The Credibility of Zhu Xi's Point of View

8.2.3. The Reliability of Chao Gongwu' s Account of the Supreme Ultimate Lineage in A Record of Junzhai Studies（ Junzhai dushu zhi）

8.2.4. Mayi Daozhe and His Relationship with Chen Tuan as Evidence for Chan Buddhist Influence

8.3. The Issue as to whether the Supreme Ultimate Lineage can be Traced Back to Chan Masters Guoyi （714-792） and Shouya （Early Northern Song Dynasty， Date Unknown）

8.3.1. The Supreme Ultimate Lineage as Recorded in

A Collection of Direct Approaches for Returning to the Source （ Guiyuan zhizhiji）

8.3.2. The Overlooked Source： the Lineage of the Supreme Ultimate as Described in the Records of Helin Temple （nelinsi zhi鹤林世志）

Conclusion

Chapter Nine： Conclusion

Appendix A The Lineage of Chinese Chan Buddhism

Appendix B Collected Diagrams

Appendix C List of Chinese Characters

Bibliography

《禅宗对邵雍重新定义太极思想的影响》将邵雍主要哲学著作《皇极经世书》中的心性学及其赖以产生的禅学思想作为考察对象，力图通过对二者原理、内涵、特点、思想渊源的考察、分析，理清邵雍哲学中禅学追求的基本思路、重要特色及其赖以产生的时代背景。广泛引用东西方学者六百多种参考文献及其研究成果，从历史和文化背景，对邵雍的生平和易学思想传承过程中所留下的禅宗烙印进行分析，论证了慧能的明心见性、宗密的禅学、临济义玄的四料简，曹洞宗宝镜三昧等禅宗思想对邵雍理学和易学思想的深刻影响。