离婚诉讼话语中权力和亲密关系的性别解读

Chapter1Introduction

1.1Rationalesforthepresentresearch

1.1.1Theoreticalrationale

1.1.2Practicalrationale

1.2Researchquestions

1.3Methodologyofthepresentresearch

1.3.1Datacollection

1.3.2Transcriptionofthedata

1.3.3Calculationandinterpretationofthe

results

1.4Organizationofthebook

Chapter2LiteratureReview:TwoMainSocial

Approaches

2.1Introduction

2.2RelatedlawissuesinChina

2.2.1Inquisitorialsystem

2.2.2Trialprocedures

2.2.3Mediation

2.3Forensiclinguistics

2.3.1Forensiclinguisticsabroad

2.3.2ForensiclinguisticsinChina

2.4Powerandforensiclinguistics

2.4.1Power:Asocialperspective

2.4.2Power:Alinguisticperspective

2.4.3Powerinforensiclinguistics

2.5Genderandlanguage

2.5.1Sexandgender

2.5.2Menandwomeninsociety

2.5.3Linguisticstudiesongender

2.6Summary

Chapter3RelevantLinguisticTheoriesandthe

AnalyticalFramework

3.1Introduction

3.2Criticaldiscourseanalysis

3.2.1Femifiistcriticaldiscourseanalysis

3.2.2Faircloughsthree-levelmodel

3.3Systemicfunctionallinguistics

3.3.1Languageasasocialsemioticsystem:

KeytenetsofSFL

3.3.2Systemicfunctionallinguistics

incriticaldiscourseanalysis

3.4Appraisaltheory

3.5Conversationanalysis

3.6Theanalyticalframework

3.7Summary

Chapter4PowerandSolidarityinCourt:The

LexicogrammatiealLevel

4.1Introduction

4.2Powerandsolidarity

4.2.1Powerandsolidarityincourt

4.2.2Powerinmarriage

4.2.3Powercomparisonsintwelvecases

4.3Appraisalelementsincourtdiscourse

4.3.1Affect

4.3.2Engagementanddeonticmodality

4.3.3Graduation

4.4Summary

Chapter5PowerandSolidarityinCourt:The

TextualLevel

5.1Introduction

5.2Speechturns

5.2.1Menandwomenstotalturnsincourt

5.2.2Turn-takingwithoutthejudges

permission

5.2.3Dispreferredturns

5.3Interruptions

5.3.1Interruptionsincourt

5.3.2Interpretation

5.4Overlap

5.5Topicinitiation/change

5.6Utterancesinvitingjudgesinvolvement

5.7Summary

Chapter6ReflectedPrejudicingIdeologiesinCourt

6.1Introduction

6.2Ideology

6.3Womensself-depictions

6.4Thejudgesbias

6.5Summary

Chapter7Conclusion

7.1Majorfindingsandsuggestions

7.2Majorcontributions

7.3Limitationsandfurtherstudies

Appendices

References

《离婚诉讼话语中权利和亲密关系的性别解读》的研究对象是12个一审离婚官司（包括调解和开庭审理两种形式）的录音转写语料。这些录音由作者本人采集于山东某区级法院，所有案件均由同一位女性法官进行审理。 就研究方法来说，《离婚诉讼话语中权利和亲密关系的性别解读》以描述性和定性分析为主，同时辅以量化数据支持。