形成性评估的概念重构

Introduction

Chapter 1  Assessment and Learning

1.1 The relatiohips between assessment and learning

1.2 Mastery Learning aligned with Psychometrics

Introduction

Chapter 1 Assessment and Learning

1.1 The relatiohips between assessment and learning

1.2 Mastery Learning aligned with Psychometrics

1.2.1 The objectives model of curriculum

1.2.2 Psychometrics

1.3 Learning as a process: Assessment as research

1.3.1 The progressive philosophy of learning

1.3.2 The recotructionism philosophy of learning

1.3.3 Curriculum design in learning as a process

1.3.4 Teacher as researcher. What about assessment？

1.4 Towards integrating assessment with itruction

1.4.1 The invention of the formative concept

1.4.2 Towards integrating assessment and itruction

1.4.3 Behaviorist connectio of the formative concept

1.5 Integrating assessment with learning

1.5.1 The cotructivist claim

1.5.2 AlL- Its ups and dow

1.5.3 Advocating AfL

1.6 Chapter summary and discussion

Chapter 2 Re-conceptualization of the formative role of assessment

2.1 Redefining the relatiohip between FA and SA

2.2 Redefining FA and AlL: Two different visio

2.3 The formative role of assessment: A double-edged sword

2.4 Summary-of the chapter

Chapter 3 Assessment as a cybernetic system

3.1 Revisiting the meta-disciplinary character of cybernetics

3.2 Control and feedback

3.3 The features of assessment as a cybernetic system

3.3.1 Assessment as an open, probabilistic system

3.3.2 Assessment as a complex system

3.3.3 Assessment as a self-regulatory system

3.3.4 The implicatio of assessment being a cybernetic system

3.4 Linking Chinese philosophy to cybernetics

3.4.1 The Yin-Yang Doctrine

3.4.2 The Doctrine of the Mean

3.4.3 Discussion

3.5 Towards a cybernetic model of assessment

3.5.1 Theoretical assumptio

3.5.2 The model

3.6 Chapter summary

Chapter 4 Accommodating the cybernetic model in China's assessment

in education. A historical pepective

4.1 The rationale and research methodology

4.2 A cybernetic undetanding of China's assessment system

4.2.1 Major themes in China's ancient assessment history

4.2.2 China's assessment system since 1949

4.2.3 The EFL education

4.3 Discussion

4.3.1 Assessment: A control system

4.3.2 Assessment: A non-deterministic system

4.4 Chapter summary

Chapter 5 Accommodating the model in classroom settings

5.1 Cross-case analysis

5.1.1 A general description of sources of data

5.1.2 Unit of analysis

5.1.3 Issue-based analyses

5.2 Fitting the model in China's EFL tertiary education

5.3 Chapter summary

Chapter 6 Winding up the research

References

Appendices

Appendix 1a Letter of Coent （for the IOE coues）

Appendix 1b Lette for informant review （some samples）

Appendix 2 Sample session notes for Coue 2/SPSS

Appendix 3 Lecturer's post-session email to CDD students

Appendix 4 C1 Coue materials

Appendix 5 An investigative questionnaire for C1, C2, C3 and C4

    
曹荣平编著的《形成性评估的概念重构》旨在通过建立一个形成性评估的理论模型来弥补形成性评估理论研究的不足。该模型的认识论基础是控制论框架下评估和学习之间的关系。借鉴控制论有关复杂系统的思想，《形成性评估的概念重构》推出的形成性评估模型可用于解释评估与学习的关系和评估的形成性工作机理。该模型视评估为复杂的学习系统中的一个复杂的控制系统。该系统具开放性、非预决性和自律性特征。评估的控制性系统特质决定了其在学习系统中的建构作用，评估对学习的控制由信息反馈来实现。基于控制论思想对评估的推断和解释与现有形成性评估概念在内涵和外延上有着显著区别，从而支持了对形成性评估进行概念重构。概念重构的意义在于：（1）修正了形成性评估的内涵和外延；（2）淡化了形成性评估和终结性评估的对抗性；（3）指出了所有类型评估皆具形成性意义；（4）指出了评估的双刃剑特性和评估系统的可自律性；（5）指出了正确认识评估系统，进而管理好这个复杂系统的必要性和可行性。

    
形成性评估是教育评价研究领域的前沿课题，然而对它的研究近年来出现瓶颈。曹荣平在其作品中指出，突破瓶颈的关键在于对形成性评估的理论建构。据此，曹荣平编著的《形成性评估的概念重构》从控制论视角对形成性评估进行了概念重构，继而推出了以评估和学习之间关系作为纽带的形成性评估理论模型。作品的理论贡献已经引起该领域国际学者的重视，推动了相关研究的发展；作品的宽阔学术视野不仅展现了作者对学习理论、课程理论、（语言）评测理论、系统论与控制论等跨学科研究领域的基础理论和专业知识的良好把握，而且指出了形成性评估理论研究的重要导向。