交互串行加工模型 : 来自汉语歧义构式V NP1 de NP2的加工证据

Acknowledgements

前言

Abstract

Chapter1 ntroduction

1.1 ResearchOrientation

1.2 ResearchBackground

1.3 TheObjectofStudy

1.4 ResearchQuestions

1.5 OrganizationoftheBook

Chapter2 entenceProcessingModels:ACriticalReview

2.1 ModularversusInteractiveModels

2.1.1 ModularModels

2.1.2 InteractiveModels

2.2 SerialversusRanked-ParallelModels

2.2.1 SerialModels

2.2.2 ParallelModels

2.2.3 UnrestrictedRaceModel——AHybridModel

2.3 AnAssessmentofCurrentSentenceProcessingModels

2.4 SerialInteractiveProcessing:APossibleModel

2.5 Summary

Chapter3 xperimentalMethodsUsedinThisStudy

3.1 Self-pacedReading

3.1.1 ThreeVersionsofSelf-pacedReading

3.1.2 PotentialProblemswithSelf-pacedReading

3.1.3 InvestigatingSemanticEffectsUsingSelf-pacedReading

3.2 StructuralPriming

3.2.1 StructuralPrimingasaResearchParadigm

3.2.2 StructuralPriminginSentenceComprehension

3.2.3 InvestigatingtheActivationofAnalysesUsingStructuralPriming

3.3 Summary

Chapter4 xperimentalStudiesontheChineseAmbiguousConstructionVNP1deNP2

4.1 Zhang's（1998）Study

4.2 Hsiehetall's（2009）Study

4.3 CritiqueoftheTwoStudies

4.4 OverviewofthePresentStudy

Chapter5ExperimentOne:EffectsofSemanticPlausibilityInformation

5.1 Introduction

5.2 Experiment1A:SemanticEffectsonProcessingVP-biasedItems

5.2.1 ResearchQuestionandHypothesis

5.2.2 Method

5.2.3 Results

5.2.4 Discussion

5.3 Experiment1B:SemanticEffectsonProcessingNP-biasedItems

5.3.1 ResearchQuestionandHypothesis

5.3.2 Method

5.3.3 Results

5.3.4 Discussion

5.4 GeneralDiscussion

5.5 Summary

Chapter6rimentTwo:AnalysisActivatedduringOnlineProcessing——Self-pacedReading

6.1 Introduction

6.2 ResearchQuestionandHypothesis

6.3 Method

6.4 Results

6.5 Discussion

6.6 Summary

Chapter7 imentThree:AnalysisActivatedduringOnlineProcessing——StructuralPrimin

7.1 ntroduction

7.2 xperiment3A:PrimingoftheVPAnalysis

7.2.1 ResearchQuestion，HypothesisandPrediction

7.2.2 Method

7.2.3 Results

7.2.4 Discussion

7.3 Experiment3B:PrimingoftheNPAnalysis

7.3.1 ResearchQuestion，HypothesisandPrediction

7.3.2 Method

7.3.3 Results

7.3.4 Discussion

7.4 GeneralDiscussion

7.5 Summary

Chapter8 iscussionandImplications

8.1 ASummaryofEmpiricalFindings

8.1.1 ImmediateUseofSemanticPlausibilityInformation

8.1.2 NPBeingthePreferredAnalysis

8.1.3 SemanticallyEquibiasedItemsBeingRepresentedasNP

8.1.4 TheOn-lineProcessingofVNP1deNP2:ASnapshot

8.2 ImplicationsoftheFindings

8.2.1 ImmediateSemanticEffects:EvidenceagainstModularity

8.2.2 OneAnalysisataTime:EvidenceagainstRankedParallelism

8.3 InteractiveSerialProcessing（ISP）:ANewSentenceProcessingModel

8.4 Limitations

8.5 SuggestionsforFutureResearch

References

AppendixAThePlausibilityRatingandPreferencePercentageoftheTestItems

AppendixBExperimentalMaterialsEmployedinExperiments1Aand1B

AppendixCExperimentalMaterialsEmployedinExperiment2

AppendixDExperimentalMaterialsEmployedinExperiments3Aand3B

句子加工是心理语言学研究的热点之一。当前句子加工领域存在两大对立的理论：花园路径模型和基于制约的模型。前者认为句子加工是模块、串行的，最初只有句法信息起作用，帮助人们构建结构上最简单的分析；后者认为句子加工中各种信息交互作用，所有可能的结构分析同时激活。然而，面对句子加工研究揭示的复杂现象，两大模型均未能做出合理解释。《交互串行加工模型：来自汉语歧义构式V NP1de NP2的加工证据》指出，句子加工完全可能按交互、串行的方式进行：各种信息交互作用，帮助人们建构一种最合理的分析。鉴于此，本研究提出了交互串行加工模型，并以汉语歧义构式为对象，考察了该模型的可行性。