2018--2019学年人教版必修三Unit 3 The Million Pound Bank Note Using language课时作业(3)
2018--2019学年人教版必修三Unit 3 The Million Pound Bank Note Using language课时作业(3)第3页

了一次去阿拉斯加冒险的机会,这次是八年后Leonhard邀请我们去拜访Idaho参加一个阿拉斯加的早先邻居的一个聚会。该句为并列复合句。由but连接。其中前句为简单句,后句为复合句,when引导时间状语从句,one more"再一个,又一个",by paying a visit to...作方式状语。

  That robots, automation, and software can replace people might seem obvious to anyone who's worked in automotive manufacturing. But MIT business scholars Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee's claim is more troubling and controversial. They believe that rapid technological change has been destroying jobs faster than it is creating them.

  They believe that technology increases productivity and makes societies wealthier, but it became clear to them that the same technologies making many jobs safer, easier, and more productive were also reducing the demand for many types of human workers. Technologies like the Web, artificial intelligence, and big data are automating many routine tasks. Countless traditional white-collar jobs, such as many in the post office and in customer service, have disappeared.

  As evidence, Brynjolfsson and McAfee point to a chart on which separate lines represent productivity and total employment in the United States. For years after World War II, the two lines closely tracked each other, with increases in jobs corresponding to increases in productivity. Then, beginning in 2000, the lines diverge; productivity continues to rise steadily, but employment suddenly shrinks. By 2011, a significant gap appears between the two lines, showing economic growth with no parallel increase in job creation.

United States Productivity and Employment